I saw them at Rock En Seine, was very very happy about it, enjoyed the concert, and everything. That said, and i've read it plenty of times, we all knew what kind of setlist to expect when the date arrived. I don't really know where you see the differences. I know what they do usually on tours, i know that these were festivals, i never ever said i wanted doom and gloom or any other thing, i'm not even complaining, i'm just making a comment, i believe they(ve stuck with their festival setlist more than ever. No problem. You disagree. Fine.
Similar experience to me. I enjoyed the show I saw, the band were on great form and sounded excellent. But it was a very predictable set similar to what they've been playing all summer. There was even an audible sigh in the crowd when the chimes faded in. Not by me I must add!
I loved the gig, great fun to see them again. Had it been any other intro, fans of plainsong would have sigh On the contrary playing 'similar' set (with all the '''''''''''' necessary here ) prevented people 'moaning' not hearing songs being played at other shows and not theirs. No jealousy . Only if they went to several gigs may have they regret not hearing different songs, maybe (maybe not, by the way). My only regret was that they dropped off wendy time, that was quite unusual and a nice little surprise.
I loved the gig, great fun to see them again. Had it been any other intro, fans of plainsong would have sigh On the contrary playing 'similar' set (with all the '''''''''''' necessary here ) prevented people 'moaning' not hearing songs being played at other shows and not theirs. No jealousy . Only if they went to several gigs may have they regret not hearing different songs, maybe (maybe not, by the way). My only regret was that they dropped off wendy time, that was quite unusual and a nice little surprise.
I wasn't speaking about the 'special shows' (SA, Mexico, Sydney); but come on steve... this year they have particularly stuck with the same tracks, just adding one here, taking off one there, and only mainly switching song orders. I believe it's this year that the track list has been more constant through a tour! The 'surprises' were wendy time and doing the unstuck. want and let's go to bed also maybe. I believe that's it....
I agree. I went to Malahide and Paris, both very cool, but knowing 99% of the setlist (the order doesn’t change anything) at each show is boring, sorry...
Rennes 1996/ Nîmes 1998/ Paris 2000 x2/ Carhaix 2002/ London 2002/ Brussels 2002/ Hamburg 2002/ Berlin 2002/ Aix les bains 2004/ Six fours 2004/ Werchter 2004/ St Malo 2005/Paris 2008/ Paris 2016/ Hyde Park 2018/ Malahide Castle 2019/ Saint-Cloud 2019/ Lyon 2022/ Montpellier 2022/ Toulouse 2022/ Bordeaux 2022/ Nantes 2022/ Strasbourg 2022/ Lievin 2022/ Paris 2022/ London 2022 x3…
I agree. I went to Malahide and Paris, both very cool, but knowing 99% of the setlist (the order doesn’t change anything) at each show is boring, sorry...
But static setlists have been a thing for decades. They are not new. If you don't believe me just look at the sets from The Head Tour Occasionally something was added or dropped, but by & large it was the same set for the entire tour. Same for The Prayer Tour. In fact, for many tours the setlist has been pretty much static. That's not opinion. That's a fact. Anyone find that boring?
I wasn't speaking about the 'special shows' (SA, Mexico, Sydney); but come on steve... this year they have particularly stuck with the same tracks, just adding one here, taking off one there, and only mainly switching song orders. I believe it's this year that the track list has been more constant through a tour! The 'surprises' were wendy time and doing the unstuck. want and let's go to bed also maybe. I believe that's it....
I agree. I went to Malahide and Paris, both very cool, but knowing 99% of the setlist (the order doesn’t change anything) at each show is boring, sorry...
If you find it boring imagine how the band feel having to play the same songs every night!!
The setlists should greatly improve next year with a brand new album to play. Or maybe even 3 new albums, that could fill up a complete new songs setlist!
Last Edit: Nov 8, 2019 18:54:24 GMT 1 by mralphabet
I agree. I went to Malahide and Paris, both very cool, but knowing 99% of the setlist (the order doesn’t change anything) at each show is boring, sorry...
If you find it boring imagine how the band feel having to play the same songs every night!!
The setlists should greatly improve next year with a brand new album to play. Or maybe even 3 new albums, that could fill up a complete new songs setlist!
Hve you been sometime in a band??? in a large tour??? or what is your criteria to asume they were boring playing the same the last summer... you can see them playing in every single show streamed... yes were the same song... not the same performance...
Post by justlikeheaven on Nov 8, 2019 21:20:16 GMT 1
I don't see any problem with static or similar setlists, it even particulary fits in a festival setting. I would gladly take any of those setlists if I can see them again someday.
Because seeing how great they are, the chemistry between them and how happy they are on stage, even the songs that, from seing them written in a setlist, you aren't overly impressed, when you are there and you hear them play it live, it can really surprise you and be a memorable moment.
At least, I know for sure it is for me. And I'm sure it is also for the people that aren't reading all the setlists online show after show and that would decide to go 'bling'.
To me, variations in setlists are like a bonus. I would, of course appreciate it if it happens, but it's not something that I would expect or focus about.
This year's shows have probably been the most repetitive since the 80s with the smallest pool of songs to draw from for a long time. Especially, if you exclude the Disintegration shows and Mexico City. They were also a bit shorter than previous festival shows. Look at the 2012 Summer Cure shows for example. So there is that.
However, what matters to me most is that they were all great shows. I saw them in Dublin and Oslo this year and in Hyde Park last year and I loved all three shows. They sound and look better than they have in years and they are clearly enjoying themselves. They are playing exactly what they want to play which is just how it should be.
Sadly, The Cure have fallen victim to the extremely high standards they set themselves. There is a feeling now among many of us that unless we get 3 hours of doom and gloom, it was a boring pop show.
I'm just happy that they're still around and are delivering great shows.
This year's shows have probably been the most repetitive since the 80s with the smallest pool of songs to draw from for a long time. Especially, if you exclude the Disintegration shows and Mexico City. They were also a bit shorter than previous festival shows. Look at the 2012 Summer Cure shows for example. So there is that.
However, what matters to me most is that they were all great shows. I saw them in Dublin and Oslo this year and in Hyde Park last year and I loved all three shows. They sound and look better than they have in years and they are clearly enjoying themselves. They are playing exactly what they want to play which is just how it should be.
Sadly, The Cure have fallen victim to the extremely high standards they set themselves. There is a feeling now among many of us that unless we get 3 hours of doom and gloom, it was a boring pop show.
I'm just happy that they're still around and are delivering great shows.
yeah i have a hard time complaining about the setlist when the band is so on fire. I think this may be the best The Cure has sounded since the salad days. Although with so many soundboards from 2019 available it's a shame that it's all the same set.