Cleaning up The Cure. Lossy or lossless?

I understand your point about just listing the raw masters but not the remasters but wouldn't that make that list quite incomplete? It's fact that many remasters are made, even from the mastertapers himself so on one hand a list of all circulating recordings is to be made to have a reference whats in circulation but the (often widely) circulating remasters aren't included? 
Including remasters shouldn't be a knock-out criteria for the list but in the end whats the difference to the list of recordings on my website then? It's for sure worth to have a list of Cure recordings with the best available version but when the best version is a remastered version it wouldn't be a usefull list when you don't have this best one in, no? 
Another point one has to think about how to be choose what is the best version. In days with many tapers using high end equipment and recordings sound excellent how to judge which one is the best. Think there are different opinions for each recording just because of the varying sounds. So i think sound samples would be necessary.